Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:44:42 -0500 | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Official documentation from Intel stating that poking INT3 (single-byte) concurrently is OK ? |
| |
Hi Peter,
I have emails from you dating from a few years back unofficially stating that it's OK to update the first byte of an instruction with a single-byte int3 concurrently:
https://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1001.1/01530.html
It is referred in the original implementation of text_poke_bp(): commit fd4363fff3d9 ("x86: Introduce int3 (breakpoint)-based instruction patching")
Olivier Dion is working on the libpatch [1,2] project aiming to use this property for low-latency/low-overhead live code patching in user-space as well, but we cannot find an official statement from Intel that guarantees this breakpoint-bypass technique is indeed OK without stopping the world while patching.
Do you know where I could find an official statement of this guarantee ?
Thanks!
Mathieu
[1] https://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/files/may2022/odion_may2022_libpatch_binary_patcher.pdf [2] https://git.sr.ht/~old/libpatch
-- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com
| |