Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:21:44 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] fixed typos on selftests/bpf | From | Martin KaFai Lau <> |
| |
On 2/14/23 7:21 PM, Taichi Nishimura wrote: > Hi Randy, > > Thank you for your reviewing. > I fixed costant and it's to constant and its, respectively. > > Best regards, > Taichi Nishimura > > Signed-off-by: Taichi Nishimura <awkrail01@gmail.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c > index a8ba39848bbf..66b304982245 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c > @@ -610,8 +610,8 @@ static INLINING ret_t get_next_hop(buf_t *pkt, encap_headers_t *encap, > * > * fill_tuple(&t, foo, sizeof(struct iphdr), 123, 321) > * > - * clang will substitute a costant for sizeof, which allows the verifier > - * to track it's value. Based on this, it can figure out the constant > + * clang will substitute a constant for sizeof, which allows the verifier > + * to track its value. Based on this, it can figure out the constant
This does not apply. Ensure the diff is generated by git, and against the bpf-next tree. Please include everything in v1 also, resubmit and tag for bpf-next in the subject.
| |