lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 0/3] watchdog: mt7621-wdt: avoid globals and arch dependencies
From
On 14.02.2023 11:12, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 13.02.2023 23:05, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This series make an update in the MT7621 SoC's watchdog driver code. This
>> SoC already provides a system controller node to access reset status
>> register needed for the watchdog. Instead of using MIPS architecture
>> dependent operations in header 'asm/mach-ralink/ralink_regs.h' get
>> node syscon regmap using 'syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible()' and use.
>> regmap APIS. Driver is also using some globals that are not needed at
>> all if a driver data structure is used along the code. Hence, add all
>> new needed stuff inside a new driver data structure. With this changes
>> driver can be properly compile tested.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for reviewing this!
>>
>> v1 of this series here [0].
>> v2 of this series here [1].
>> v3 of this series here [2].
>> v4 of this series here [3].
>> v5 of this series here [4].
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>>      - Get regmap syscon using 'syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible()'
>>      - Add COMPILE_TEST and dependencies to Kconfig.
>>      - Collect Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 'Reviewed-by' tag for watchdog node
>>        warning fix.
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>>      - Drop patches related with device tree ABI breakage and only
>>        maintain the rest.
>
> This makes me regret taking mt7621-dts out of drivers/staging. Clearly
> there were improvements to be made on the MT7621 drivers that would
> affect the devicetree binding. I don't think one would bat an eye to
> make dt-binding changes on a devicetree on drivers/staging.
>
> I also want to make a similar change that would break the ABI. I want to
> split the MediaTek MIPS (currently called Ralink) pinctrl subdrivers
> further, namely mt7620.c, to split MT7628/MT7688 pinmux data from
> MT7620, so I can properly document which function can be given to which
> group(s) for the MT7628/MT7688 SoCs.
>
> This means I've got to introduce a new compatible string for the MT76X8
> SoCs which would cause the pinctrl driver to stop working with an old DT
> for the MT76X8 SoCs. By the nature of the change, I can't make a way
> around with the code like Sergio did in v6.

Now that I think about it, I think there's a way I can introduce a new
compatible string for the sake of better documentation, and keep the
driver working with old DTs. I'd not like to convolute this series with
this conversation. I'll send a mail to the related mailing list when the
time is right.

Arınç

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:21    [W:0.087 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site