Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | [PATCH] bcachefs: six lock: fix typos | Date | Sat, 9 Dec 2023 22:06:44 -0800 |
| |
Fix a few typos in the six.h header file.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org --- fs/bcachefs/six.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -- a/fs/bcachefs/six.h b/fs/bcachefs/six.h --- a/fs/bcachefs/six.h +++ b/fs/bcachefs/six.h @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ * will have to take write locks for the full duration of the operation. * * But by adding an intent state, which is exclusive with other intent locks but - * not with readers, we can take intent locks at thte start of the operation, + * not with readers, we can take intent locks at the start of the operation, * and then take write locks only for the actual update to each individual * nodes, without deadlocking. * @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ * * Reentrancy: * - * Six locks are not by themselves reentrent, but have counters for both the - * read and intent states that can be used to provide reentrency by an upper + * Six locks are not by themselves reentrant, but have counters for both the + * read and intent states that can be used to provide reentrancy by an upper * layer that tracks held locks. If a lock is known to already be held in the * read or intent state, six_lock_increment() can be used to bump the "lock * held in this state" counter, increasing the number of unlock calls that
| |