| Subject | Re: [PATCH 19/34] sfc: switch to using atomic find_bit() API where appropriate | From | Edward Cree <> | Date | Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:46:39 +0000 |
| |
On 18/11/2023 15:50, Yury Norov wrote: > SFC code traverses rps_slot_map and rxq_retry_mask bit by bit. We can do > it better by using dedicated atomic find_bit() functions, because they > skip already clear bits. > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
|