lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v4 4/6] x86/microcode/intel: Use a plain revision argument for print_ucode_rev()
Date
print_ucode_rev() takes a struct ucode_cpu_info argument. The sole purpose
of it is to print the microcode revision.

The only available ucode_cpu_info always describes the currently loaded
microcode revision. After a microcode update is successful, this is the new
revision, or on failure it is the original revision.

Subsequent changes need to print both the original and new revision, but
the original version will be cached in a plain integer, which makes the
code inconsistent.

Replace the struct ucode_cpu_info argument with a plain integer which
contains the revision number and adjust the call sites accordingly.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Changes since V1:

Thomas:
- Updated commit log as suggested
- Remove the line break after static void before print_ucode_info
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 31 ++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 6bebc46ad8b1..1d709b72cfd0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -310,13 +310,10 @@ static bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
/*
* Print ucode update info.
*/
-static void
-print_ucode_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, unsigned int date)
+static void print_ucode_info(unsigned int new_rev, unsigned int date)
{
pr_info_once("microcode updated early to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- uci->cpu_sig.rev,
- date & 0xffff,
- date >> 24,
+ new_rev, date & 0xffff, date >> 24,
(date >> 16) & 0xff);
}

@@ -334,7 +331,7 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)

if (delay_ucode_info) {
intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
- print_ucode_info(&uci, current_mc_date);
+ print_ucode_info(uci.cpu_sig.rev. current_mc_date);
delay_ucode_info = 0;
}
}
@@ -343,33 +340,23 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
* At this point, we can not call printk() yet. Delay printing microcode info in
* show_ucode_info_early() until printk() works.
*/
-static void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
int *delay_ucode_info_p;
int *current_mc_date_p;

- mc = uci->mc;
- if (!mc)
- return;
-
delay_ucode_info_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&delay_ucode_info);
current_mc_date_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&current_mc_date);

*delay_ucode_info_p = 1;
- *current_mc_date_p = mc->hdr.date;
+ *current_mc_date_p = date;
}
#else

-static inline void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static inline void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc;
-
- mc = uci->mc;
- if (!mc)
- return;
-
- print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(new_rev, date);
}
#endif

@@ -409,9 +396,9 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;

if (early)
- print_ucode(uci);
+ print_ucode(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
else
- print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);

return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:33    [W:1.098 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site