lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:12:26 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:59:13 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:06:25 +0800
> > Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the
> > > code does not return negative values.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for simplifying, this looks good to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Masami, do you want to take it into the probes branch, or do you want me to
> take it into the tracing branch?

Yes, I'll take it to probe/for-next.

Thank you!

>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
> > >


--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:34    [W:0.974 / U:1.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site