Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:29:03 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf |
| |
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:12:26 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:59:13 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:06:25 +0800 > > Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the > > > code does not return negative values. > > > > > > > Thanks for simplifying, this looks good to me. > > > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > Masami, do you want to take it into the probes branch, or do you want me to > take it into the tracing branch?
Yes, I'll take it to probe/for-next.
Thank you!
> > -- Steve > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com> > > >
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
| |