lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectProblem with pat_enable() and commit 72cbc8f04fe2
Date
I've come across a case with a VM running on Hyper-V that doesn't get
MTRRs, but the PAT is functional. (This is a Confidential VM using
AMD's SEV-SNP encryption technology with the vTOM option.) In this
case, the changes in commit 72cbc8f04fe2 ("x86/PAT: Have pat_enabled()
properly reflect state when running on Xen") apply. pat_enabled() returns
"true", but the MTRRs are not enabled.

But with this commit, there's a problem. Consider memremap() on a RAM
region, called with MEMREMAP_WB plus MEMREMAP_DEC as the 3rd
argument. Because of the request for a decrypted mapping,
arch_memremap_can_ram_remap() returns false, and a new mapping
must be created, which is appropriate.

The following call stack results:

memremap()
arch_memremap_wb()
ioremap_cache()
__ioremap_caller()
memtype_reserve() <--- pcm is _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WB
pat_x_mtrr_type() <-- only called after commit 72cbc8f04fe2

pat_x_mtrr_type() returns _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC_MINUS because
mtrr_type_lookup() fails. As a result, memremap() erroneously creates the
new mapping as uncached. This uncached mapping is causing a significant
performance problem in certain Hyper-V Confidential VM configurations.

Any thoughts on resolving this? Should memtype_reserve() be checking
both pat_enabled() *and* whether MTRRs are enabled before calling
pat_x_mtrr_type()? Or does that defeat the purpose of commit
72cbc8f04fe2 in the Xen environment?

I'm also looking at how to avoid this combination in a Hyper-V Confidential
VM, but that doesn't address underlying the flaw.

Michael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:33    [W:0.061 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site