lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning
Date
Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
eliminating a kernel-doc warning:

kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
}
#endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */

+#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
/**
* seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
* @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
*
* Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
*/
-#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
struct seccomp_filter **match)
{
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:32    [W:0.043 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site