Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | cgel.zte@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH linux-next] perf intel-pt: use strscpy() is more robust and safer | Date | Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:36:44 +0000 |
| |
From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> --- tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c index 0ac860c8dd2b..0194e2003ba7 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int intel_pt__strerror(int code, char *buf, size_t buflen) { if (code < 1 || code >= INTEL_PT_ERR_MAX) code = INTEL_PT_ERR_UNK; - strlcpy(buf, intel_pt_err_msgs[code], buflen); + strscpy(buf, intel_pt_err_msgs[code], buflen); return 0; } -- 2.25.1
| |