Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | cgel.zte@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH linux-next] perf lock: use strscpy() is more robust and safer | Date | Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:32:31 +0000 |
| |
From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> --- tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c index 52a6a10a610c..b6837b7df110 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c @@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int lock_contention_caller(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_sample *sampl if (offset) scnprintf(buf, size, "%s+%#lx", sym->name, offset); else - strlcpy(buf, sym->name, size); + strscpy(buf, sym->name, size); return 0; } -- 2.25.1
| |