lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Propose critical clocks
On 22-09-13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/09/2022 12:21, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this proposal is to mark clocks as critical. It is somehow inspired by
> > the regulator-always-on property. Since sometimes we can end in circular
> > dependcies if we wanna solve the dependcies for a specific clock
> > provider.
> >
> > The property is generic so it can be used by every hw clock provider. So
> > it can be seen as generic implementation to [1].
>
> Missing devicetree list (so no testing), missing bindings. Please follow
> Linux process, run checkpatch and CC necessary people an dlists pointed
> out by get_maintainers.pl.

I just pushd the _proposal_ as reaction of adding a NXP specific
binding. If the clk maintainer(s) would agree to this this proposal I
would update the patchset with bindings and _all_ mail-addresses.

Regards,
Marco

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-13 13:51    [W:0.158 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site