lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Propose critical clocks
Hi Stephen, Michael,

I know it is a busy time right now, but maybe you have a few minutes for
this RFC. I know it is incomplete, but the interessting part is there
and it would fix a real issue we encountered on the imx8mm-evk's.

Regards,
Marco

On 22-09-13, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this proposal is to mark clocks as critical. It is somehow inspired by
> the regulator-always-on property. Since sometimes we can end in circular
> dependcies if we wanna solve the dependcies for a specific clock
> provider.
>
> The property is generic so it can be used by every hw clock provider. So
> it can be seen as generic implementation to [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20220913092136.1706263-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
>
> Marco Felsch (2):
> clk: add support for critical always-on clocks
> arm64: dts: imx8mm-evk: mark 32k pmic clock as always-on
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi | 1 +
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-05 10:24    [W:0.128 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site