lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block()
Date
ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
fs/ufs/balloc.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
index bd810d8239f2..2436e3f82147 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
@@ -295,14 +295,10 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg,

if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos);
- if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
- ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
- wait_on_buffer(bh);
- if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
- ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
- "read of block failed\n");
- break;
- }
+ if (bh_read(bh, 0) < 0) {
+ ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
+ "read of block failed\n");
+ break;
}

UFSD(" change from %llu to %llu, pos %u\n",
--
2.31.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-01 15:26    [W:0.242 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site