lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH linux-next] rpmsg: char: Remove the unneeded result variable
Hi,

I am fine with the patch but I need to understand who is "cgel.zte" - are we
talking about a person or an automated bot. In case of the former than an SoB
from that person needs to be on this patch. If an automated bot, than that
needs to be changed to someone accountable for the code that can put an SoB on
the patch.

Thanks,
Mathieu

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:19:54AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
>
> Return the value rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add() directly instead of storing it
> in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index 4f2189111494..0850ae34fb88 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -424,15 +424,12 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
> {
> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
> - int ret;
>
> eptdev = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, parent);
> if (IS_ERR(eptdev))
> return PTR_ERR(eptdev);
>
> - ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create);
>
> --
> 2.25.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-31 18:47    [W:0.162 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site