Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:07:05 +0200 | Subject | Re: [Intel-wired-lan] ice: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) @ 5.18.x | From | Thorsten Leemhuis <> |
| |
On 17.08.22 17:59, Tony Nguyen wrote: > On 8/17/2022 2:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 05.07.22 15:51, Wilczynski, Michal wrote: >>> >>> Adding Grzegorz Siwik, since he is working on similar issue and already >>> has a patch that is being tested/reviewed internally at the moment. >>> >>> He can you a send patch tomorrow so you can test if it also fixes your >>> problem. >> >> Tony, Jesse, I have to wonder: why is it taken so long to get this >> regression fixed? The regression was reported 69 days ago and the first >> patches to fix this went out 40 days ago. That's far from ideal. > > Our validation found issues when testing the original fix which caused > the delays as the new issues were being worked out.
Yeah, that happens, still I wish it wouldn't taken *that* much longer then what's outlined in the docs.
Side note: this and a similar issue I had today made me wonder if we need a tag to make "this is a regression fix" more obvious to reviewers and maintainers. But I guess that overblown; should be enough if developers make it obvious in their cover letter or description that this fixes a regression.
>> Reminder: this regression ideally should have been fixed within two >> weeks after the report, as explained here: >> https://docs.kernel.org/process/handling-regressions.html >> >> FWIW, in case anyone wonders: the latest patch-series to fix this can be >> found here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/1660310750-290943-1-git-send-email-grzegorz.siwik@intel.com/ > > I was going to point you to the newest patches, but you located them. > Our validation finished testing them yesterday so the pull request for > these will be going out to netdev today.
Great, many thx.
Ciao, Thorsten
| |