lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: dts: mediatek: cherry: Enable the System Companion Processor
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:50 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> MT8195 features a SCP like some other older SoCs, and Cherry uses it
> for various tasks. Add the required pin configuration and DMA pool
> and enable the node.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
> index fcc600674339..feebbe367e93 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ usb_vbus: regulator-5v0-usb-vbus {
> enable-active-high;
> regulator-always-on;
> };
> +
> + reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + scp_mem: memory@50000000 {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reg = <0 0x50000000 0 0x2900000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> &i2c0 {
> @@ -600,6 +612,14 @@ pins-low-power-pupd {
> };
> };
>
> + scp_pins: scp-default-pins {
> + pins-vreq {
> + pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO76__FUNC_SCP_VREQ_VAO>;
> + bias-disable;
> + input-enable;
> + };
> + };
> +
> spi0_pins: spi0-default-pins {
> pins-cs-mosi-clk {
> pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO132__FUNC_SPIM0_CSB>,
> @@ -643,6 +663,14 @@ &pmic {
> interrupts-extended = <&pio 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> };
>
> +&scp {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + memory-region = <&scp_mem>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;

firmware-name = "mediatek/mt8195/scp.img";

Or maybe this should be added to the base mt8195.dtsi?

The entry for mt8192 was added to mt8192-asurada.dtsi though.

Tinghan, could you ask internally whether the SCP firmware should be
tied to the SoC or the projects involving the SoC?

Thanks
ChenYu

> +};
> +
> &spi0 {
> status = "okay";
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-25 06:22    [W:0.143 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site