Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jun 2022 11:48:08 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpf, iter: Fix the condition on p when calling stop. | From | Yonghong Song <> |
| |
On 6/10/22 12:44 PM, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > From: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> > > In bpf_seq_read, seq->op->next() could return an ERR and jump to > the label stop. However, the existing code in stop does not handle > the case when p (returned from next()) is an ERR. Adds the handling > of ERR of p by converting p into an error and jumping to done. > > Because all the current implementations do not have a case that > returns ERR from next(), so this patch doesn't have behavior changes > right now. > > Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
| |