Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> | Subject | [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: order interrupts according to bindings | Date | Mon, 9 May 2022 16:47:14 +0200 |
| |
The CAMSS DTSI device node, which came after the bindings were merged, got the interrupts ordered differently then specified in the bindings:
sdm630-sony-xperia-nile-pioneer.dtb: camss@ca00000: interrupt-names:0: 'csid0' was expected
Reordering them to match bindings should not cause ABI issues, because the driver relies on names, not ordering.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi index 594a802e9429..2c540476a8be 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi @@ -1870,23 +1870,23 @@ camss: camss@ca00000 { "ispif", "vfe0", "vfe1"; - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, - <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, - <GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, - <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, <GIC_SPI 297 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, <GIC_SPI 298 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, <GIC_SPI 299 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, + <GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, + <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, + <GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, <GIC_SPI 309 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, <GIC_SPI 314 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, <GIC_SPI 315 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; - interrupt-names = "csiphy0", - "csiphy1", - "csiphy2", - "csid0", + interrupt-names = "csid0", "csid1", "csid2", "csid3", + "csiphy0", + "csiphy1", + "csiphy2", "ispif", "vfe0", "vfe1"; -- 2.32.0
| |