lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/4] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Apple SoC cpufreq driver
From
On 04/05/2022 19.17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-05-22, 16:51, Hector Martin wrote:
>> Splitting this commit, as usual, to facilitate merges via the SoC tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index edc96cdb85e8..39bfa478fe55 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1835,6 +1835,7 @@ T: git https://github.com/AsahiLinux/linux.git
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apple.yaml
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apple/*
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/apple,nco.yaml
>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/apple,soc-cpufreq.yaml
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/apple,*
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/apple,mailbox.yaml
>> @@ -1844,6 +1845,7 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/apple*
>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/apple,wdt.yaml
>> F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/
>> F: drivers/clk/clk-apple-nco.c
>> +F: drivers/cpufreq/apple-soc-cpufreq.c
>> F: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi-core.c
>> F: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi-platform.c
>> F: drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
>
> This should be the last patch instead, or should at least be added
> after the files are merged first. If someone checks out at this
> commit, the files won't be available but still linked here.

Isn't that backwards? If someone touches the files, we want them to be
able to get_maintainer.pl, so the MAINTAINERS entries should come first.
It doesn't really cause any issues if there are entries that point at
files that don't exist yet, right?

Though this is mostly a moot point because the purpose of splitting this
out is so we can merge this one patch through the SoC tree, at which
point the ordering isn't guaranteed (unless the whole series goes
through SoC). It's a minor issue though; we've done it like this for
other series and it hasn't caused anyone trouble.

--
Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-04 16:53    [W:0.107 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site