Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 May 2022 12:31:40 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Remove unnecessary huge_ptep_set_access_flags() in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() | From | Anshuman Khandual <> |
| |
On 5/25/22 15:56, Baolin Wang wrote: > There is no need to update the hugetlb access flags after just setting the > hugetlb page table entry by set_huge_pte_at(), since the page table entry > value has no changes. Thus remove the unnecessary huge_ptep_set_access_flags()
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #9: value has no changes. Thus remove the unnecessary huge_ptep_set_access_flags()
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked
> in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(). > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Otherwise LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> --- > mm/hugetlb.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > index 7c468ac..3ad49bf 100644 > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > @@ -6032,8 +6032,6 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, > > set_huge_pte_at(dst_mm, dst_addr, dst_pte, _dst_pte); > > - (void)huge_ptep_set_access_flags(dst_vma, dst_addr, dst_pte, _dst_pte, > - dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE); > hugetlb_count_add(pages_per_huge_page(h), dst_mm); > > /* No need to invalidate - it was non-present before */
| |