lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] staging: r8188eu: add check for kzalloc
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 11:26:55PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 5/21/22 18:50, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > > for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> > > @@ -1474,7 +1479,7 @@ s32 rtw_xmit_classifier(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pxmitframe)
> >
> >
> > res is still 0 here - but the caller of _rtw_init_xmit_priv compares
> > this return value with _SUCCESS (1) or _FAIL (0) and interprets it as
> > _FAIL.
> >
>
> I think, it's time to make
>
> s/_SUCCESS/0/
> s/_FAIL/-1
>
> since developers from outside of staging are confused.
> The main problem will be with functions that return an int (or s32).
>
> Will take a look.
>
>
>
> With regards,
> Pavel Skripkin

Hi Pavel,

I agree with you totally - we should change these semantics to reflect
how the rest of the kernel generally does things. That said, that is a
bigger patch set and I noticed the driver was broken before I read this
thread, so I've submitted a patch already just to fix the breakage for
now.

Changing these semantics is a bigger patch/patchset and I wanted to get
this out in the meantime - if you are looking at doing this conversion I
will by all means leave that alone as no desire to tread on anyones
toes :-)

Regards,
Phil

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-21 22:57    [W:0.056 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site