Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 May 2022 10:06:09 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite driver binding | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 18/05/2022 17:47, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 2:23 PM >> To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@xilinx.com>; davem@davemloft.net; >> edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; >> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; Harini Katakam >> <harinik@xilinx.com> >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; git <git@xilinx.com> >> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite >> driver binding >> >> On 12/05/2022 18:39, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote: >>> Add basic description for the xilinx emaclite driver DT bindings. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/net/xlnx,emaclite.yaml | 60 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/xlnx,emaclite.yaml >> >> Why is this RFC? Do you expect DT maintainers review or not? Maybe there is >> no point for us to review something which is not going to be applied? > > I intentionally made it RFC so that all aspects are reviewed as this driver didn't > had an existing binding. I will send out next version with below comment > addressed. Thanks!
RFC means you develop something which is not ready, not sure how to do it, you send an initial idea. Sending a regular bindings as RFC, without explaining what you expect, is a bit confusing.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |