lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite driver binding
From
On 18/05/2022 17:47, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 2:23 PM
>> To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@xilinx.com>; davem@davemloft.net;
>> edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com;
>> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; Harini Katakam
>> <harinik@xilinx.com>
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; git <git@xilinx.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite
>> driver binding
>>
>> On 12/05/2022 18:39, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>>> Add basic description for the xilinx emaclite driver DT bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/net/xlnx,emaclite.yaml | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/xlnx,emaclite.yaml
>>
>> Why is this RFC? Do you expect DT maintainers review or not? Maybe there is
>> no point for us to review something which is not going to be applied?
>
> I intentionally made it RFC so that all aspects are reviewed as this driver didn't
> had an existing binding. I will send out next version with below comment
> addressed. Thanks!

RFC means you develop something which is not ready, not sure how to do
it, you send an initial idea. Sending a regular bindings as RFC, without
explaining what you expect, is a bit confusing.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-19 10:07    [W:0.082 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site