Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 May 2022 21:23:27 -0700 | From | Alexei Starovoitov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC bpf-next v4 0/7] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices (new attempt) |
| |
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 09:12:09AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > Also, I wonder if we should not have some way to namespace kfuncs. > Ideally, I would like to prevent the usage of those kfuncs outside of > some helpers that I define in HID so I don't have to worry too much > about other trace programs fuzzing and segfaulting the kernel.
That would be a great feature to have. Other folks expressed the same interest. Just grouping them by prog type is not flexible enough. It feels kfuncs could be scoped by (prog_type, attach_btf_id or attach_hook) pair. What are your thoughts?
| |