lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH V3 07/30] x86/sgx: Rename sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() as sgx_encl_cpumask()
Date
sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() is no longer unique to the reclaimer where it
is used during the EWB ENCLS leaf function when EPC pages are written
out to main memory and sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() is used to learn which
CPUs might have executed the enclave to ensure that TLBs are cleared.

Upcoming SGX2 enabling will use sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() during the
EMODPR and EMODT ENCLS leaf functions that make changes to enclave
pages. The function is needed for the same reason it is used now: to
learn which CPUs might have executed the enclave to ensure that TLBs
no longer point to the changed pages.

Rename sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() to sgx_encl_cpumask() to reflect the
broader usage.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
No changes since V2

Changes since V1:
- New patch split from original "x86/sgx: Use more generic name for
enclave cpumask function" (Jarkko).

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
index c6525eba74e8..8de9bebc4d81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ int sgx_encl_mm_add(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct mm_struct *mm)
}

/**
- * sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() - Query which CPUs might be accessing the enclave
+ * sgx_encl_cpumask() - Query which CPUs might be accessing the enclave
* @encl: the enclave
*
* Some SGX functions require that no cached linear-to-physical address
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ int sgx_encl_mm_add(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct mm_struct *mm)
* The following flow is used to support SGX functions that require that
* no cached linear-to-physical address mappings are present:
* 1) Execute ENCLS[ETRACK] to initiate hardware tracking.
- * 2) Use this function (sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask()) to query which CPUs might be
+ * 2) Use this function (sgx_encl_cpumask()) to query which CPUs might be
* accessing the enclave.
* 3) Send IPI to identified CPUs, kicking them out of the enclave and
* thus flushing all locally cached linear-to-physical address mappings.
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ int sgx_encl_mm_add(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct mm_struct *mm)
*
* Return: cpumask of CPUs that might be accessing @encl
*/
-const cpumask_t *sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask(struct sgx_encl *encl)
+const cpumask_t *sgx_encl_cpumask(struct sgx_encl *encl)
{
cpumask_t *cpumask = &encl->cpumask;
struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
index d2acb4debde5..e59c2cbf71e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int sgx_encl_may_map(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long start,

void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref);
int sgx_encl_mm_add(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct mm_struct *mm);
-const cpumask_t *sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask(struct sgx_encl *encl);
+const cpumask_t *sgx_encl_cpumask(struct sgx_encl *encl);
int sgx_encl_get_backing(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long page_index,
struct sgx_backing *backing);
void sgx_encl_put_backing(struct sgx_backing *backing, bool do_write);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index 2de85f459492..fa33922879bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static void sgx_encl_ewb(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
* miss cpus that entered the enclave between
* generating the mask and incrementing epoch.
*/
- on_each_cpu_mask(sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask(encl),
+ on_each_cpu_mask(sgx_encl_cpumask(encl),
sgx_ipi_cb, NULL, 1);
ret = __sgx_encl_ewb(epc_page, va_slot, backing);
}
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-05 00:42    [W:0.654 / U:1.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site