Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Muchun Song <> | Subject | [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: fix p?d_leaf() | Date | Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:00:33 +0800 |
| |
The pmd_leaf() is used to test a leaf mapped PMD, however, it misses the PROT_NONE mapped PMD on arm64. Fix it. A real world issue [1] caused by this was reported by Qian Cai. Also fix pud_leaf().
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24798260/ [1] Fixes: 8aa82df3c123 ("arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions") Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> --- v3: - Fix pud_leaf() as well. - Rework pmd_leaf() as present && !table.
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index 930077f7b572..9aae3773b6c4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn, PMD_TYPE_TABLE) #define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \ PMD_TYPE_SECT) -#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd) +#define pmd_leaf(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !pmd_table(pmd)) #define pmd_bad(pmd) (!pmd_table(pmd)) #define pmd_leaf_size(pmd) (pmd_cont(pmd) ? CONT_PMD_SIZE : PMD_SIZE) @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd) #define pud_none(pud) (!pud_val(pud)) #define pud_bad(pud) (!pud_table(pud)) #define pud_present(pud) pte_present(pud_pte(pud)) -#define pud_leaf(pud) pud_sect(pud) +#define pud_leaf(pud) (pud_present(pud) && !pud_table(pud)) #define pud_valid(pud) pte_valid(pud_pte(pud)) static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud) -- 2.11.0
| |