lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 3/3] arm64: dts: Add mediatek SoC mt8195 and evaluation board
From


On 29/03/2022 12:17, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 14:26 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 16/02/2022 12:31, Tinghan Shen wrote:
>>> Add basic chip support for mediatek mt8195.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@mediatek.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts | 161 +++
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 1049 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 1211 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile
>>> index 8c1e18032f9f..5da29e7223e4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile
>>> @@ -38,4 +38,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8183-kukui-krane-sku0.dtb
>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8183-kukui-krane-sku176.dtb
>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8183-pumpkin.dtb
>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8192-evb.dtb
>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8195-evb.dtb
>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mt8516-pumpkin.dtb
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-
>>> evb.dts
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..51633d91d984
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-evb.dts
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
>>
>> [...]
>>> +
>>> +&u2port0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&u2port1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&u3phy0 {
>>> + status="okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&u3phy1 {
>>> + status="okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> So we enable phys for xhci but not the device. Are we missing anything to enable
>> them on the EVB?
>
> after discussed with usb expert, we think that we're missing the xhci nodes.
> I'll add xhci nodes at next version.
>
>>
>>> +&uart0 {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pin>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..a363e82f6988
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1049 @@
>>
>> [...]
>>> +
>>> + clk32k: oscillator-32k {
>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <32768>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "clk32k";
>>
>> I suppose the 32KHz oscillator is really present on the board also not used by
>> any device (up to now?).
>
> Yes. 32KHz clock is still available on MT8195.
> Some modules can choose 32K as clock source depending on requirements.
>

Thanks for the confirmation.

>>
>> [...]
>>> +
>>> + soc {
>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>>> + ranges;
>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>> +
>>> + pwrap: pwrap@10024000 {
>>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pwrap", "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0 0x10024000 0 0x1000>;
>>> + reg-names = "pwrap";
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 243 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>> + clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_PMIC_AP>,
>>> + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_PMIC_TMR>;
>>> + clock-names = "spi", "wrap";
>>
>> Binding mandates resets but not present here. It also mandates two register
>> regions, but only one is given here.
>
> After discussed with pwrap experts, the pwrap binding is out-of-date for mt8195.
> They will send a patch to fix pwrap binding.
>

If possible can you add the patch fixing the pwrap binding in this series, then
I don't have to search for the dependencies in my inbox. That would be of great
help.

>>
>>> + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC>;
>>> + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_ULPOSC1_D10>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + scp_adsp: clock-controller@10720000 {
>>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp_adsp";
>>> + reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0x1000>;
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +
>>> + mmc0: mmc@11230000 {
>>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmc",
>>> + "mediatek,mt8183-mmc";
>>> + reg = <0 0x11230000 0 0x10000>,
>>> + <0 0x11f50000 0 0x1000>;
>>
>> Seems to be an oversight when adding support for mt8183-mmc support to the
>> driver. The binding description is missing the optional host top register base.
>> Chaotian can you please help to fix this in the binding description.
>
> Ok. I'll fix it at next version.
>

I'm not sure what you mean. I suppose the way forward is to fix the binding
description, correct?

Thanks,
Matthias

>>
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 131 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>> + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MSDC50_0>,
>>> + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_MSDC0>,
>>> + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_MSDC0_SRC>;
>>> + clock-names = "source", "hclk", "source_cg";
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>> +
>>> + xhci3: usb@112b0000 {
>>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-xhci",
>>> + "mediatek,mtk-xhci";
>>> + reg = <0 0x112b0000 0 0x1000>,
>>> + <0 0x112b3e00 0 0x0100>;
>>> + reg-names = "mac", "ippc";
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 536 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>> + phys = <&u2port3 PHY_TYPE_USB2>;
>>> + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_USB_TOP_3P>,
>>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SSUSB_XHCI_3P>;
>>> + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_UNIVPLL_D5_D4>,
>>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_UNIVPLL_D5_D4>;
>>> + clocks = <&pericfg_ao CLK_PERI_AO_SSUSB_3P_BUS>,
>>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SSUSB_P3_REF>,
>>> + <&pericfg_ao CLK_PERI_AO_SSUSB_3P_XHCI>;
>>> + clock-names = "sys_ck", "ref_ck", "xhci_ck";
>>> + /* This controller is connected with a BT device.
>>> + * Disable usb2 lpm to prevent konwn issues.
>>> + */
>>> + usb2-lpm-disable;
>>
>> My understanding is, that this depends on the board and not the SoC. Which means
>> usb2-lpm-disable should go into any board that has a BT device connected to the
>> xhci device (I don't see any active xhci node in mt8195-evb so far).
>
> Ok. I'll move this property to evb board in a xhci node.
>
> Best regards,
> TingHan
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-29 16:24    [W:0.089 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site