lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mvebu: Document bindings for AC5
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:27:48AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I think it can. I vaguely remember seeing conditional clauses based on
> > compatible strings in other yaml bindings.
> >
> > I started a new binding document because I expected adding significant
> > additions to the existing .txt files would be rejected. If I get some
> > cycles I could look at converting the existing docs from txt to yaml.
> >
> > I'm not sure that there will be much in the way of a common
> > mvebu-pinctrl.yaml as you'd end up repeating most of the common stuff to
> > make things conditional anyway.
>
> We should wait for Rob to comment. But is suspect you are right, there
> will not be much savings.

It's always a judgement call of amount of if/then schema vs. duplicating
the common parts. If it's the function/pin parts that vary, then that's
probably best as separate schema for each case. Otherwise, I'm not sure
without seeing something.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-23 19:35    [W:0.677 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site