Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Mar 2022 08:54:59 +0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: tegra210-quad: Add wait polling support | From | Jon Hunter <> |
| |
On 17/03/2022 01:20, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote: > Controller can poll for wait state inserted by TPM device and > handle it. > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c > index a2e225e8f7f0..ecf171bfcdce 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ > > #define QSPI_GLOBAL_CONFIG 0X1a4 > #define QSPI_CMB_SEQ_EN BIT(0) > +#define QSPI_TPM_WAIT_POLL_EN BIT(1) > > #define QSPI_CMB_SEQ_ADDR 0x1a8 > #define QSPI_ADDRESS_VALUE_SET(X) (((x) & 0xFFFF) << 0) > @@ -165,11 +166,13 @@ struct tegra_qspi_soc_data { > bool has_dma; > bool cmb_xfer_capable; > bool cs_count; > + bool has_wait_polling; > }; > > struct tegra_qspi_client_data { > int tx_clk_tap_delay; > int rx_clk_tap_delay; > + bool wait_polling; > }; > > struct tegra_qspi { > @@ -833,6 +836,11 @@ static u32 tegra_qspi_setup_transfer_one(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_tran > else > command1 |= QSPI_CONTROL_MODE_0; > > + if (tqspi->soc_data->cmb_xfer_capable) > + command1 &= ~QSPI_CS_SW_HW; > + else > + command1 |= QSPI_CS_SW_HW; > + > if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH) > command1 |= QSPI_CS_SW_VAL; > else > @@ -917,6 +925,7 @@ static int tegra_qspi_start_transfer_one(struct spi_device *spi, > > static struct tegra_qspi_client_data *tegra_qspi_parse_cdata_dt(struct spi_device *spi) > { > + struct tegra_qspi *tqspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > struct tegra_qspi_client_data *cdata; > > cdata = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*cdata), GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -927,6 +936,11 @@ static struct tegra_qspi_client_data *tegra_qspi_parse_cdata_dt(struct spi_devic > &cdata->tx_clk_tap_delay); > device_property_read_u32(&spi->dev, "nvidia,rx-clk-tap-delay", > &cdata->rx_clk_tap_delay); > + if (tqspi->soc_data->has_wait_polling) > + cdata->wait_polling = device_property_read_bool > + (&spi->dev, > + "nvidia,wait-polling"); > +
This looks odd. Why do we need this device-tree property if it is already specified in the SoC data?
Jon
-- nvpublic
| |