lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 05/10] dt-bindings: timer: Add HPE GXP Timer Binding
From
On 11/03/2022 17:22, Hawkins, Nick wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:52:24PM -0600, nick.hawkins@hpe.com wrote:
>>> From: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>>
>>>
>>> Creating binding for gxp timer in device tree hpe,gxp-timer Although
>>> there are multiple times on the SoC we are only enabling one at this
>>> time.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> *Removed maintainer change from patch *Verified there was no
>>> compilation errors *Added reference code in separate patch of
>>> patchset
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/timer/hpe,gxp-timer.yaml | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/hpe,gxp-timer.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/hpe,gxp-timer.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/hpe,gxp-timer.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..1f4e345c5fb8
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/hpe,gxp-timer.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id:
>>> +INVALID URI REMOVED
>>> +xp-timer.yaml*__;Iw!!NpxR!yaItMPvjqEf3fKyp1xDQAzawRQDd8uDGTNKMlVPpn5Y
>>> +56IUABMYbali7jonBl20K$
>>> +$schema:
>>> +INVALID URI REMOVED
>>> +aml*__;Iw!!NpxR!yaItMPvjqEf3fKyp1xDQAzawRQDd8uDGTNKMlVPpn5Y56IUABMYba
>>> +li7jmX565-G$
>>> +
>>> +title: HPE GXP TIMER
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>>
>>> + - Jean-Marie Verdun <verdun@hpe.com>>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: hpe,gxp-timer
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: T0CNT register
>>> + - description: T0CS register
>>> + - description: TIMELO register
>
>> Is the spec public to know what T0CNT, T0CS, and TIMELO are?
> No it is not, should I not mention the register descriptions at all?
>
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + clock-frequency:
>>> + description: The frequency of the clock that drives the counter, in Hz.
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - interrupts
>>> + - clock-frequency
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + timer@10003000 {
>>> + compatible = "hpe,gxp-timer";
>>> + reg = <0xc0000080 0x1>>, <0xc0000094 0x01>>, <0xc0000088 0x08>>;
>
>> Based on the driver these are 4 bytes, 1 byte, 4 bytes in size.
>
>> Are there other registers in 0x80-0x95 range or do these offsets change in other chips? If not, just 1 entry covering the whole thing would be better.
> There are other registers in this range that cover different timers/clocks, for the most part between chip generations the offsets remain the same unless there is an architectural issue.
> Can you provide a quick example of what one entry would be?

arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-ab.dts

and actually 90% of DTS... it's rather a challange to find such
fine-grained iomap.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-11 18:16    [W:0.023 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site