lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 18/41] sched: Avoid double preemption in __cond_resched_*lock*()
Date
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

[ Upstream commit 7e406d1ff39b8ee574036418a5043c86723170cf ]

For PREEMPT/DYNAMIC_PREEMPT the *_unlock() will already trigger a
preemption, no point in then calling preempt_schedule_common()
*again*.

Use _cond_resched() instead, since this is a NOP for the preemptible
configs while it provide a preemption point for the others.

Reported-by: xuhaifeng <xuhaifeng@oppo.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YcGnvDEYBwOiV0cR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0d12ec7be3017..c2dec6ce98091 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8199,9 +8199,7 @@ int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)

if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
spin_unlock(lock);
- if (resched)
- preempt_schedule_common();
- else
+ if (!_cond_resched())
cpu_relax();
ret = 1;
spin_lock(lock);
@@ -8219,9 +8217,7 @@ int __cond_resched_rwlock_read(rwlock_t *lock)

if (rwlock_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
read_unlock(lock);
- if (resched)
- preempt_schedule_common();
- else
+ if (!_cond_resched())
cpu_relax();
ret = 1;
read_lock(lock);
@@ -8239,9 +8235,7 @@ int __cond_resched_rwlock_write(rwlock_t *lock)

if (rwlock_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
write_unlock(lock);
- if (resched)
- preempt_schedule_common();
- else
+ if (!_cond_resched())
cpu_relax();
ret = 1;
write_lock(lock);
--
2.34.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-03 21:39    [W:0.169 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site