lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 04/13] vfio/mdev: remove the usage of the list iterator after the loop
From
Date


> On 18. Feb 2022, at 16:12, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 07:48:20PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
>> It is unsafe to assume that tmp != mdev can only evaluate to false
>> if the break within the list iterator is hit.
>>
>> When the break is not hit, tmp is set to an address derived from the
>> head element. If mdev would match with that value of tmp it would allow
>> continuing beyond the safety check even if mdev was never found within
>> the list
>
> I think due to other construction this is not actually possible, but I
> guess it is technically correct
>
> This seems like just a straight up style fix with nothing to do with
> speculative execution though. Why not just send it as a proper patch?
>
> Jason

Thank you for your feedback.

I've raised some confusion here, I'm sorry about that.
The idea was to change list_for_each_entry() to set 'pos' to NULL
when the list terminates to avoid invalid usage in speculation.

This will break this code and I therefore included the suggested change
in this RFC. This RFC was not intended to be merged as is.

However, in this example, 'tmp' will be a out-of-bounds pointer
if the loop did finish without hitting the break, so the check past the
loop *could* match 'mdev' even though no break was ever met.

I've now realized that this is probably not realistic iff mdev always
points to a valid struct mdev_device.
(It's a slightly different scenario on PATCH 03/13).

Jakob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-23 15:19    [W:0.347 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site