Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Changbin Du <> | Subject | [PATCH] libbpf: Return -ENODATA for missing btf section | Date | Sat, 31 Dec 2022 23:14:36 +0800 |
| |
As discussed before, return -ENODATA (No data available) would be more meaningful than ENOENT (No such file or directory).
Suggested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c index dd2badf1a54e..2c89454c0136 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_elf(const char *path, struct btf *base_btf, if (!btf_data) { pr_warn("failed to find '%s' ELF section in %s\n", BTF_ELF_SEC, path); - err = -ENOENT; + err = -ENODATA; goto done; } btf = btf_new(btf_data->d_buf, btf_data->d_size, base_btf); -- 2.37.2
|  |