lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
Subject[PATCH v3 1/2] x86/resctrl: Fix event counts regression in reused RMIDs
From
When creating a new monitoring group, the RMID allocated for it may have
been used by a group which was previously removed. In this case, the
hardware counters will have non-zero values which should be deducted
from what is reported in the new group's counts.

resctrl_arch_reset_rmid() initializes the prev_msr value for counters to
0, causing the initial count to be charged to the new group. Resurrect
__rmid_read() and use it to initialize prev_msr correctly.

Unlike before, __rmid_read() checks for error bits in the MSR read so
that callers don't need to.

Fixes: 1d81d15db39c ("x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() into resctrl_arch_rmid_read()")
Signed-off-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
v3:
- add changelog
- CC stable
v2:
- move error bit processing into __rmid_read()

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221207112924.3602960-1-peternewman@google.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221214160856.2164207-1-peternewman@google.com/
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index efe0c30d3a12..77538abeb72a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -146,6 +146,30 @@ static inline struct rmid_entry *__rmid_entry(u32 rmid)
return entry;
}

+static int __rmid_read(u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid, u64 *val)
+{
+ u64 msr_val;
+
+ /*
+ * As per the SDM, when IA32_QM_EVTSEL.EvtID (bits 7:0) is configured
+ * with a valid event code for supported resource type and the bits
+ * IA32_QM_EVTSEL.RMID (bits 41:32) are configured with valid RMID,
+ * IA32_QM_CTR.data (bits 61:0) reports the monitored data.
+ * IA32_QM_CTR.Error (bit 63) and IA32_QM_CTR.Unavailable (bit 62)
+ * are error bits.
+ */
+ wrmsr(MSR_IA32_QM_EVTSEL, eventid, rmid);
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_QM_CTR, msr_val);
+
+ if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_ERROR)
+ return -EIO;
+ if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *val = msr_val;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct arch_mbm_state *get_arch_mbm_state(struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom,
u32 rmid,
enum resctrl_event_id eventid)
@@ -172,8 +196,12 @@ void resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
struct arch_mbm_state *am;

am = get_arch_mbm_state(hw_dom, rmid, eventid);
- if (am)
+ if (am) {
memset(am, 0, sizeof(*am));
+
+ /* Record any initial, non-zero count value. */
+ __rmid_read(rmid, eventid, &am->prev_msr);
+ }
}

static u64 mbm_overflow_count(u64 prev_msr, u64 cur_msr, unsigned int width)
@@ -191,25 +219,14 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_dom(d);
struct arch_mbm_state *am;
u64 msr_val, chunks;
+ int ret;

if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &d->cpu_mask))
return -EINVAL;

- /*
- * As per the SDM, when IA32_QM_EVTSEL.EvtID (bits 7:0) is configured
- * with a valid event code for supported resource type and the bits
- * IA32_QM_EVTSEL.RMID (bits 41:32) are configured with valid RMID,
- * IA32_QM_CTR.data (bits 61:0) reports the monitored data.
- * IA32_QM_CTR.Error (bit 63) and IA32_QM_CTR.Unavailable (bit 62)
- * are error bits.
- */
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_QM_EVTSEL, eventid, rmid);
- rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_QM_CTR, msr_val);
-
- if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_ERROR)
- return -EIO;
- if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)
- return -EINVAL;
+ ret = __rmid_read(rmid, eventid, &msr_val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;

am = get_arch_mbm_state(hw_dom, rmid, eventid);
if (am) {
base-commit: 830b3c68c1fb1e9176028d02ef86f3cf76aa2476
--
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:16    [W:0.046 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site