lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 3/3] Documentation: riscv: add a section about ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:41:26PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> The RISC-V specs are permissive in what they allow as the ISA string,
> but how we output this to userspace in /proc/cpuinfo is quasi uAPI.
>
> Formalise this as part of the uAPI, by documenting the list of rules
> we use at this point in time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
> I've not "tested" these docs. The NIPA-esque pwbot should go and
> test it AFAICT. If it doesn't, I'll go add that.
> ---
> Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
> index 21a82cfb6c4d..bc3c8ced644b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
> @@ -3,4 +3,46 @@
> RISC-V Linux User ABI
> =====================
>
> +Misaligned accesses
> +-------------------
> +
> Misaligned accesses are supported in userspace, but they may perform poorly.
> +
> +ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo
> +------------------------------------
> +
> +The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in
> +chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification.
> +The specification uses vague wording, such as should, when it comes to
> +ordering, so for our purposes the following rules apply:
> +
> +#. Single-letter extensions come first, in "canonical order", so
> + "IMAFDQLCBKJTPVH".
> +
> +#. All multi-letter extensions will be separated from other multi-letter
> + extensions by an underscore.
> +
> +#. Additional standard extensions (starting with 'Z') will be sorted after
> + single-letter extensions and before any higher-privileged extensions.
> +
> +#. The first letter following the 'Z' conventionally indicates the most
> + closely related alphabetical extension category, IMAFDQLCBKJTPVH.
> + If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they should be ordered first by
> + category, then alphabetically within a category.
> +
> +#. Standard supervisor-level extensions (starting with 'S') will be listed
> + after standard unprivileged extensions. If multiple
> + supervisor-level extensions are listed, they will be ordered
> + alphabetically.
> +
> +#. Standard machine-level extensions (starting with 'Zxm') will be listed
> + after any lower-privileged, standard extensions. If multiple
> + machine-level extensions are listed, they will be ordered
> + alphabetically.
> +
> +#. Non-standard extensions (starts with 'X') will be listed after all

Ehh, it's always the read *after* sending something that I notice the
inconsistency. This should be s/starts/starting/ for consistency.

> + standard extensions.
> +
> +An example string following the order is:
> + rv64imadc_zifoo_zigoo_zafoo_sbar_scar_zxmbaz_xqux_xrux
> +
> --
> 2.38.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-01 00:47    [W:2.169 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site