lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 4/9] cxl/mem: Skip intermediate port enumeration of restricted endpoints (RCDs)
Robert Richter wrote:
> On 14.11.22 16:07:58, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Robert Richter wrote:
> > > When an endpoint is found, all ports in beetween the endpoint and the
> > > CXL host bridge need to be created. In the RCH case there are no ports
> > > in between a host bridge and the endpoint. Skip the enumeration of
> > > intermediate ports.
> > >
> > > The port enumeration does not only create all ports, it also
> > > initializes the endpoint chain by adding the endpoint to every
> > > downstream port up to the root bridge. This must be done also in RCD
> > > mode, but is much more simple as the endpoint only needs to be added
> > > to the host bridge's dport.
> > >
> > > Note: For endpoint removal the cxl_detach_ep() is not needed as it is
> > > released in cxl_port_release().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > > index d10c3580719b..e21a9c3fe4da 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > > @@ -1366,8 +1366,24 @@ int devm_cxl_enumerate_ports(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> > > struct device *iter;
> > > + struct cxl_dport *dport;
> > > + struct cxl_port *port;
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Skip intermediate port enumeration in the RCH case, there
> > > + * are no ports in between a host bridge and an endpoint. Only
> > > + * initialize the EP chain.
> > > + */
> > > + if (is_cxl_restricted(cxlmd)) {
> >
> > I changed this to:
> >
> > if (cxlmd->cxlds->rcd) {
>
> I a mail to Bjorn I suggested to have cxl_dev_cap and a cxl_port_cap
> in the pci_dev struct that could be looked up too including RCD mode.
> Checking the pci_dev looks more reasonable to me here, though we could
> have a flag of it in cxlds too.

Would that not need the PCI core to understand how to walk the RCRB
generically? As far as I understand the RCRB association is ACPI.CEDT
specific.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-15 19:10    [W:0.081 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site