lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/11] usb: host: xhci-tegra: Add Tegra234 XHCI support
From
On 28/10/2022 14:39, Thierry Reding wrote:

...

>> +static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra234_soc = {
>> + .firmware = "nvidia/tegra234/xusb.bin",
>> + .supply_names = tegra194_supply_names,
>> + .num_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_supply_names),
>> + .phy_types = tegra194_phy_types,
>> + .num_types = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_phy_types),
>> + .context = &tegra186_xusb_context,
>> + .ports = {
>> + .usb3 = { .offset = 0, .count = 4, },
>> + .usb2 = { .offset = 4, .count = 4, },
>> + },
>> + .scale_ss_clock = false,
>> + .has_ipfs = false,
>> + .otg_reset_sspi = false,
>> + .ops = &tegra234_ops,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_CMD,
>> + .data_in = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN,
>> + .data_out = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT,
>> + .owner = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_OWNER,
>> + .smi_intr = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_SMI_INTR,
>> + },
>> + .lpm_support = true,
>> + .has_bar2 = true,
>> + .has_ifr = true,
>> +};
>> +MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra234/xusb.bin");
>
> Can you prepare a patch to add this firmware to the linux-firmware
> repository? I don't see it there yet.


Actually, we should remove the MODULE_FIRMWARE completely for Tegra234.
Per the commit message the variable 'has_ifr' is used to indicate if the
firmware is loaded by calling request_firmware() or via these IFR
registers. I wonder if we need this 'has_ifr' variable if we should just
avoid setting the 'firmware' variable for Tegra234 and use this instead
of the 'has_ifr'?

Jon

--
nvpublic

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-01 15:54    [W:0.086 / U:1.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site