Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | cuijinpeng666@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH linux-next] clocksource: Use strscpy() instead of strlcpy() | Date | Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:13:12 +0000 |
| |
From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zaelci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn> --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index dcaf38c06216..a3e7edfbb3c2 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ static int __init boot_override_clocksource(char* str) { mutex_lock(&clocksource_mutex); if (str) - strlcpy(override_name, str, sizeof(override_name)); + strscpy(override_name, str, sizeof(override_name)); mutex_unlock(&clocksource_mutex); return 1; } -- 2.25.1
| |