Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | qixiaoyu1 <> | Subject | [PATCH] f2fs: separate IPU policy for fdatasync from F2FS_IPU_FSYNC | Date | Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:31:36 +0800 |
| |
Currently IPU policy for fdatasync is coupled with F2FS_IPU_FSYNC. Fix to apply it to all IPU policy.
Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@xiaomi.com> --- fs/f2fs/data.c | 8 +++----- fs/f2fs/file.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c index a71e818cd67b..fec8e15fe820 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c @@ -2518,6 +2518,9 @@ static inline bool check_inplace_update_policy(struct inode *inode, if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE) && is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_OPU_WRITE)) return false; + /* this is set by fdatasync or F2FS_IPU_FSYNC policy */ + if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NEED_IPU)) + return true; if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FORCE)) return true; if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_SSR) && f2fs_need_SSR(sbi)) @@ -2538,11 +2541,6 @@ static inline bool check_inplace_update_policy(struct inode *inode, !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)) return true; - /* this is only set during fdatasync */ - if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FSYNC) && - is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NEED_IPU)) - return true; - if (unlikely(fio && is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) && !f2fs_is_checkpointed_data(sbi, fio->old_blkaddr))) return true; diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c index 82cda1258227..08091550cdf2 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c @@ -270,8 +270,10 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, goto go_write; /* if fdatasync is triggered, let's do in-place-update */ - if (datasync || get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_fsync_blocks) + if (datasync || (SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FSYNC) && + get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_fsync_blocks)) set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU); + ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end); clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU); -- 2.36.1
| |