Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:14:59 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: Don't increase effective low/min if no protection needed | From | Waiman Long <> |
| |
On 10/11/22 13:04, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> You are right about that. An alternative way to address this issue is to >> disable memory low event when memory.low isn't set. An user who want to >> track memory.low event has to set it to a non-zero value. Would that be >> acceptable? > Wouldn't it make sense to fix the test? With recursive_prot on, the cgroup > actually is under low protection and it seems like the correct behavior is > to report the low events accordingly.
Yes, that is another possible way of looking at that problem. Will talk to our QE people of doing that.
Thanks, Longman
| |