Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2022 07:04:32 -1000 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: Don't increase effective low/min if no protection needed |
| |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > You are right about that. An alternative way to address this issue is to > disable memory low event when memory.low isn't set. An user who want to > track memory.low event has to set it to a non-zero value. Would that be > acceptable?
Wouldn't it make sense to fix the test? With recursive_prot on, the cgroup actually is under low protection and it seems like the correct behavior is to report the low events accordingly.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |