lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] irqchip/meson-gpio: support more than 8 channels gpio irq line
On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 08:42:16 +0000,
Qianggui Song <qianggui.song@amlogic.com> wrote:
>
> Current meson gpio irqchip driver only support 8 channels for gpio irq
> line, later chips may have more then 8 channels, so need to modify code
> to support more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qianggui Song <qianggui.song@amlogic.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
> index d90ff0b92480..6a7b4fb13452 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>
> -#define NUM_CHANNEL 8
> #define MAX_INPUT_MUX 256
>
> #define REG_EDGE_POL 0x00
> @@ -60,6 +59,7 @@ struct irq_ctl_ops {
>
> struct meson_gpio_irq_params {
> unsigned int nr_hwirq;
> + unsigned int channel_num;

For consistency, please name this nr_channels.

> bool support_edge_both;
> unsigned int edge_both_offset;
> unsigned int edge_single_offset;
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct meson_gpio_irq_params {
> .edge_single_offset = 0, \
> .pol_low_offset = 16, \
> .pin_sel_mask = 0xff, \
> + .channel_num = 8, \
>
> #define INIT_MESON_A1_COMMON_DATA(irqs) \
> INIT_MESON_COMMON(irqs, meson_a1_gpio_irq_init, \
> @@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ struct meson_gpio_irq_params {
> .edge_single_offset = 8, \
> .pol_low_offset = 0, \
> .pin_sel_mask = 0x7f, \
> + .channel_num = 8, \
>
> static const struct meson_gpio_irq_params meson8_params = {
> INIT_MESON8_COMMON_DATA(134)
> @@ -136,8 +138,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id meson_irq_gpio_matches[] = {
> struct meson_gpio_irq_controller {
> const struct meson_gpio_irq_params *params;
> void __iomem *base;
> - u32 channel_irqs[NUM_CHANNEL];
> - DECLARE_BITMAP(channel_map, NUM_CHANNEL);
> + u32 *channel_irqs;
> + unsigned long *channel_map;
> + u8 channel_num;

Same thing. Though this is completely superfluous, see below.

> spinlock_t lock;
> };
>
> @@ -207,8 +210,8 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->lock, flags);
>
> /* Find a free channel */
> - idx = find_first_zero_bit(ctl->channel_map, NUM_CHANNEL);
> - if (idx >= NUM_CHANNEL) {
> + idx = find_first_zero_bit(ctl->channel_map, ctl->channel_num);
> + if (idx >= ctl->channel_num) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags);
> pr_err("No channel available\n");
> return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -447,13 +450,25 @@ static int meson_gpio_irq_parse_dt(struct device_node *node, struct meson_gpio_i
>
> ctl->params = match->data;
>
> + ctl->channel_num = ctl->params->channel_num;

Since you already have a pointer to params, why do you need to
duplicate this information?

> + ctl->channel_irqs = kcalloc(ctl->channel_num,
> + sizeof(*ctl->channel_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctl->channel_irqs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctl->channel_map = bitmap_zalloc(ctl->params->channel_num, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctl->channel_map) {
> + kfree(ctl->channel_irqs);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> ret = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(node,
> "amlogic,channel-interrupts",
> ctl->channel_irqs,
> - NUM_CHANNEL,
> - NUM_CHANNEL);
> + ctl->channel_num,
> + ctl->channel_num);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - pr_err("can't get %d channel interrupts\n", NUM_CHANNEL);
> + pr_err("can't get %d channel interrupts\n", ctl->channel_num);
> return ret;

You are now leaking the bitmap and channel_map allocations.

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-08 11:38    [W:0.046 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site