| Subject | Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 08/45] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:20:34 -0700 |
| |
On 8/20/21 8:58 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote: > +static int handle_split_page_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > +{ > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)) > + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; > + > + __split_huge_pmd(vmf->vma, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, false, NULL); > + return 0; > +}
We had a whole conversation the last time this was posted about huge page types *other* than THP. I don't see any comprehension of those types or what would happen if one of those was used with SEV-SNP.
What was the result of those review comments?
I'm still worried that hugetlbfs (and others) are not properly handled by this series.
|