lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
From
Date


On 4/9/21 6:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:23:39PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> On 4/8/21 11:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> This looks good to me however I'd really like someone who has a firmer
>>> understanding of what ftrace is doing to double check as it is entirely
>>> likely that I am missing cases here, it seems likely that if I am
>>> missing stuff it's extra stuff that needs to be added and we're not
>>> actually making use of the reliability information yet.
>
>> OK. So, do you have some specific reviewer(s) in mind? Apart from yourself, Mark Rutland and
>> Josh Poimboeuf, these are some reviewers I can think of (in alphabetical order):
>
> Mainly Mark Rutland, but generally someone else who has looked at ftrace
> on arm64 in detail. It was mainly a comment to say I wasn't going to do
> any kind of Reviewed-by but also hadn't spotted any issues.
>

Understood.

Madhavan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-09 16:03    [W:0.047 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site