lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:23:39PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
> On 4/8/21 11:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This looks good to me however I'd really like someone who has a firmer
> > understanding of what ftrace is doing to double check as it is entirely
> > likely that I am missing cases here, it seems likely that if I am
> > missing stuff it's extra stuff that needs to be added and we're not
> > actually making use of the reliability information yet.

> OK. So, do you have some specific reviewer(s) in mind? Apart from yourself, Mark Rutland and
> Josh Poimboeuf, these are some reviewers I can think of (in alphabetical order):

Mainly Mark Rutland, but generally someone else who has looked at ftrace
on arm64 in detail. It was mainly a comment to say I wasn't going to do
any kind of Reviewed-by but also hadn't spotted any issues.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-09 13:32    [W:0.061 / U:2.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site