lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in alloc_workqueue call
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:12:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count,
> > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the
> > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count.
>
> Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the
> series.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>

Will do.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-19 16:53    [W:0.109 / U:1.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site