Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:51:58 -0400 | From | Dan Schatzberg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in alloc_workqueue call |
| |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:12:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > > > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count, > > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the > > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count. > > Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the > series. > > -- > Jens Axboe >
Will do.
| |