lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in alloc_workqueue call
    From
    Date
    On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote:
    > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
    >
    > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count,
    > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the
    > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count.

    Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the
    series.

    --
    Jens Axboe

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2021-03-18 21:13    [W:3.105 / U:0.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site