lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i2c: mpc: Use atomic read and fix break condition

> we'd hit the 100us timeout in the poll). But I see no evidence of that
> actually happening (and no idea what arbitration lost means w.r.t i2c).

On a bus with multiple masters, it means the other master has won the
arbitration because the address it wants to talk to contains more 0 bits.

> I don't know that there is a maximum clock stretch time (we certainly
> know there are misbehaving devices that hold SCL low forever). The SMBUS
> protocol adds some timeouts but as far as I know i2c says nothing about
> how long a remote device can hold SCL.

The above is all correct.

Even with the unclear situation about the 100us, I think this should go
to for-current soon, right?


[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-09 10:22    [W:0.056 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site