lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH v5] random: fix crash on multiple early calls to add_bootloader_randomness()
Am Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 01:42:01PM +0800 schrieb Hsin-Yi Wang:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:59 PM Dominik Brodowski
> <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > Am Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:55:10AM -0500 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
> > > Thanks for the patch. One trivial nit and one question:
> >
> > Thanks for your review!
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:35 AM Dominik Brodowski
> > > <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> > > > + /* We cannot do much with the input pool until it is set up in
> > > > + * rand_initalize(); therefore just mix into the crng state.
> > >
> > > I think you meant "rand_initialize()" here (missing 'i').
> >
> > Indeed, sorry about that.
> >
> > > > If the added entropy suffices to increase crng_init to 1, future calls
> > > > to add_bootloader_randomness() or add_hwgenerator_randomness() used to
> > > > progress to credit_entropy_bits(). However, if the input pool is not yet
> > > > properly set up, the cmpxchg call within that function can lead to an
> > > > infinite recursion.
> > >
> > > I see what this patch does with crng_global_init_time, and that seems
> > > probably sensible, but I didn't understand this part of the reasoning
> > > in the commit message; I might just be a bit slow here. Where's the
> > > recursion exactly? Or even an infinite loop?
> >
> > On arm64, it was actually a NULL pointer dereference reported by Ivan T.
> > Ivanov; see
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211012082708.121931-1-iivanov@suse.de/
> >
> > Trying to reproduce this rather bluntly on x86/qemu by multiple manual calls
> > to add_bootloader_randomness(), I mis-interpreted the symptoms to point to an
> > infinite recursion. The real problem seems to be that crng_reseed() isn't
> > ready to be called too early in the boot process, in particular before
> > workqueues are ready (see the call to numa_crng_init()).
> >
> > However, there seem be additional issues with add_bootloader_randomness()
> > not yet addressed (or worsened) by my patch:
> >
> > - If CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER is enabled and crng_init==0,
> > add_hwgenerator_randomness() calls crng_fast_load() and returns
> > immediately. If it is disabled and crng_init==0,
> > add_device_randnomness() calls crng_slow_load() but still
> > continues to call _mix_pool_bytes(). That means the seed is
> > used more extensively if CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER is not
> > set!
> If called by the crng_slow_load(), it's mixed into the pool but we're
> not trusting it. But in crng_fast_load() we're using it to init crng.
>
> >
> > - If CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER is enabled and crng_init==0,
> > the entropy is not credited -- same as if
> > CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER is not set. Only subsequent calls
>
> In crng_fast_load(), the seed would be mixed to primary_crng.state[4],

Actually, that is also the case for crng_slow_load() (see dest_buf there).

> and then crng_init will be 1 if the added seed is enough.
> rng-seed in dt (called in early_init_dt_scan_chosen()) also needs to
> use this function to init crng.

Indeed, crng_init should be set to 1 in that case.

> With the patch, we're seeing
> [ 0.000000] random: get_random_u64 called from
> __kmem_cache_create+0x34/0x270 with crng_init=0
>
> While before it should be
> [ 0.000000] random: get_random_u64 called from
> __kmem_cache_create+0x34/0x280 with crng_init=1
>
> > to add_bootloader_randomness() would credit entropy, but that
> > causes the issue NULL pointer dereference or the hang...
> >
> > - As crng_fast_load() returns early, that actually means that my
> > patch causes the additional entropy submitted to
> > add_hwgenerator_randomness() by subsequent calls to be completely
> > lost.
> Only when crng_init==0, if crng is initialized, it would continue with
> credit_entropy_bits().

However, if workqueues are not up and running (yet), it will fail.

New draft below!

Thanks,
Dominik

---

Currently, if CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER is enabled, mutliple calls
to add_bootloader_randomness() are broken and can cause a NULL pointer
dereference, as noted by Ivan T. Ivanov. This is not only a hypothetical
problem, as qemu on arm64 may provide bootloader entropy via EFI and via
devicetree.

On the first call to add_hwgenerator_randomness(), crng_fast_load() is
executed, and if the seed is long enough, crng_init will be set to 1.
However, no entropy is currently credited for that, even though the
name and description of CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER states otherwise.

On subsequent calls to add_bootloader_randomness() and then to
add_hwgenerator_randomness(), crng_fast_load() will be skipped. Instead,
wait_event_interruptible() (which makes no sense for the init process)
and then credit_entropy_bits() will be called. If the entropy count for
that second seed is large enough, that proceeds to crng_reseed().
However, crng_reseed() may depend on workqueues being available, which
is not the case early during boot.

To fix these issues, explicitly call crng_fast_load() or crng_slow_load()
depending on whether the bootloader is trusted -- only in the first
instance, crng_init may progress to 1. Also, mix the seed into the
input pool unconditionally, and credit the entropy for that iff
CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER is set. However, avoid a call to
crng_reseed() too early during boot. It is safe to be called after
rand_initialize(), so use crng_global_init_time (which is set to != 0
in that function) to determine which branch to take.

Reported-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@suse.de>
Fixes: 18b915ac6b0a ("efi/random: Treat EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL output as bootloader randomness")
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 605969ed0f96..abe4571fd2c0 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -722,7 +722,8 @@ static void credit_entropy_bits(struct entropy_store *r, int nbits)
if (r == &input_pool) {
int entropy_bits = entropy_count >> ENTROPY_SHIFT;

- if (crng_init < 2 && entropy_bits >= 128)
+ if (crng_init < 2 && entropy_bits >= 128 &&
+ crng_global_init_time > 0)
crng_reseed(&primary_crng, r);
}
}
@@ -1763,8 +1764,8 @@ static void __init init_std_data(struct entropy_store *r)
}

/*
- * Note that setup_arch() may call add_device_randomness()
- * long before we get here. This allows seeding of the pools
+ * add_device_randomness() or add_bootloader_randomness() may be
+ * called long before we get here. This allows seeding of the pools
* with some platform dependent data very early in the boot
* process. But it limits our options here. We must use
* statically allocated structures that already have all
@@ -2291,15 +2292,29 @@ void add_hwgenerator_randomness(const char *buffer, size_t count,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_hwgenerator_randomness);

/* Handle random seed passed by bootloader.
- * If the seed is trustworthy, it would be regarded as hardware RNGs. Otherwise
- * it would be regarded as device data.
+ * If the seed is trustworthy, its entropy will be credited.
* The decision is controlled by CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER.
*/
void add_bootloader_randomness(const void *buf, unsigned int size)
{
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER))
- add_hwgenerator_randomness(buf, size, size * 8);
- else
- add_device_randomness(buf, size);
+ unsigned long time = random_get_entropy() ^ jiffies;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!crng_ready() && size) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER
+ crng_fast_load(buf, size);
+#else
+ crng_slow_load(buf, size);
+#endif /* CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER */
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&input_pool.lock, flags);
+ _mix_pool_bytes(&input_pool, buf, size);
+ _mix_pool_bytes(&input_pool, &time, sizeof(time));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&input_pool.lock, flags);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER
+ credit_entropy_bits(&input_pool, size * 8);
+#endif
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_bootloader_randomness);
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-06 21:58    [W:0.439 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site