Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sat, 4 Dec 2021 21:05:19 +0800 | From | kernel test robot <> | Subject | [RFC PATCH t-kristo-pm] HID: hid_prog_ops can be static |
| |
drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c:151:27: warning: symbol 'hid_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c:184:31: warning: symbol 'hid_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: 1995666cad0e ("HID: initial BPF implementation") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> --- hid-bpf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c b/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c index 8792cb5eacd20..fd12a2059d66f 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int hid_bpf_prog_query(struct hid_device *hdev, const union bpf_attr *att } -const struct bpf_prog_ops hid_prog_ops = { +static const struct bpf_prog_ops hid_prog_ops = { }; static const struct bpf_func_proto * @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static bool hid_is_valid_access(int off, int size, return true; } -const struct bpf_verifier_ops hid_verifier_ops = { +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops hid_verifier_ops = { .get_func_proto = hid_func_proto, .is_valid_access = hid_is_valid_access };
| |